Follow Us On:

Flaman Blog

Intercropping Has Merit

Written By: Robin Booker, Western ProducerMay 18, 2017

 Trials have shown reduced disease with a chickpea-flax intercrop, but some are skeptical about a mustard-pulse

Growers might have noticed healthier crop stands where wild mustard was present.

“There are a lot of anecdotes where they said the only place where they had any kind of lentils worth harvesting is where they had some wild mustard weeds. The lentils were climbing up the wild mustard and they did better under those conditions than where there wasn’t mustard or canola,” said Lana Shaw, crop researcher at South East Research Farm. 

Shaw said she also had good results with a small trial she ran last year, which she is expanding this summer.

“We have a trial this year where we are doing mustard with peas, and mustard with lentils, both yellow mustard and brown mustard,” Shaw said.

“There are some very good reasons to expect less diseases, based on lab results. Mustard type of residues have in the past reduced aphanomyces pressure in susceptible pulse crops, so lentils and peas.”

She said the possibility of biofungicide properties that may reduce root rot is a research area that is only beginning to be explored.

Shaw has researched intercrops for years and her research into a chickpea-flax intercrop had shown a reduced disease incidence and increased tolerance to excessive moisture compared to monocrops.

“The chickpeas hold up better. They mature more consistently, and on the years where we’ve had disease pressure, they’ve held up to disease pressure and lodge less,” Shaw said.

When there is crop disease present, it doesn’t seem to spread as well when there is another other crop in the mix.

If the disease spores land on a non-target plant they are unable to spread, and the microclimate in the canopy is less humid, she said.

“A chickpea crop on its own tends to have a lot of horizontal branches that kind of seal in moisture. Whereas with a flax crop, most of your stems are vertical, so I think there is more air movement, but that is something that we haven’t quantified so far,” Shaw said.

She said growers who want to grow peas or lentils in wet conditions will not add to their risk by adding a small amount of mustard or canola seed.

“A mustard or canola in there at a very low rate, we’re talking like three or four pounds an acre for mustard, and for some kinds of canolas you might do two pounds of a hybrid canola with pea,” Shaw said.

Growers can plant a Clearfield pea with a small amount of Clearfield canola and can have Solo as an in-crop herbicide option.

“If you’ve already got a bunch of Group 2 resistant weeds, than maybe it’s not worthwhile worrying about it and you just go with non-Clearfield mustard with a lentil. It might work fantastic,” Shaw said.

Brent VanKoughnet manages a farm in the Carman, Man., area and is owner of Agri Skills Inc., a company that performs agricultural research and has studied pea and canola intercropping.

“I don’t see it (pea-canola intercrop) much as a moisture strategy, I see it more of a nutrient efficiency strategy. If everything goes well, you can get 60 percent of two different crops,” VanKoughnet said.

He said the canola does reasonably well with very little additional nitrogen added, and that it must be grabbing some nitrogen from the peas.

“It (canola) captures the efficiency of the peas and their ability to produce nitrogen, and if we get that right, can they produce more than they need for themselves and give some of that to the canola? That’s the theory anyway.”

However, when it comes to using canola to help manage diseases in pulse crops, he said most growers need compelling evidence that it works before they try it.

“I think those are long shots. Producers generally want to be clean. If they thought a crop was going to be in trouble clean, they would grow another crop. It’s the reason we’re not growing lentils in Manitoba. We just expect the moisture to be high,” VanKoughnet said.

In experiments at Agri Skills, they were striving for two crops, rather than seeding a small amount of canola to help the peas climb and for possible biofungicide benefits from the canola roots.

But in VanKoughnet’s experience, airflow in the canopy was not improved.

“There is an amazing mass of material when you have 60 percent of a pea crop wrapped around 60 percent of a canola crop. If you ever thought it was tough to scout a canola field, just double that when you’ve got it all woven together with pea vines. You need a machete to walk your way through it,” VanKoughnet said.

He said most growers don’t want to complicate their operations by making their spraying windows harder to hit and limiting their herbicide options.

He said people in his area love growing soybeans because they are simple, easy to harvest and clean.

“You don’t want to upset the flow of efficient commercial operations.”

“When you think of how many farms that have doubled in size in the last decade, just logistics and getting stuff done efficiently matters,” VanKoughnet said.

If there was a market for peas and canola grown together where growers could haul in their mixture directly to without having to clean it, VanKoughnet thinks more growers would be interested.

He said most growers aren’t interested in taking off a crop that requires cleaning before marketing.

“The cleaning is a pain too. It works with a pretty simple corn screen that takes the canola out of peas pretty easily. But it slows things down. It’s just another step and generally people want to be able to move through harvest as quickly as possible.”

Shaw said it’s difficult to track the amount of acres in intercrops because there are no stats available on the practice, but she estimates there were about 20,000 acres in Saskatchewan last year.

“This is a daring comparison, but I think this (intercropping) will be as transformative to agriculture here as no-till was. In 10 years, I think we will see this taking over a lot of the acres,” Shaw said.


> Take me to Flaman Agriculture and Farm Equipment

> Take me to Used and Clearance Products

Have questions? Connect with us through our contact page

Like what you read here?

Why not sign up for our newsletter to receive more?

Posted in Uncategorized | More articles by Robin Booker

Demand Grows for Vomitoxin Cleaning Services - excerpt

Written By: MIchelle Corry, Flaman MarketingApr 11, 2017
Below is an excerpt from "Demand Grows for Vomitoxin Cleaning Services" by Brian Cross of the Western Producer. For the full article visit the Western Producer Online

With fusarium graminearum and its toxic vomitoxin sidekick deoxynivalenol (DON) stealing potentially hundreds of millions of dollars a year from Canadian farm revenues, the thought of paying toll processors to clean up commercial grain deliveries is gaining momentum.

Mitch Flaman, operations manager with Flaman Grain Cleaning and Handling, said a lot of growers mistakenly assume that a sample with little or no FDK should easily meet industry standards or contract specs for vomitoxin. However, removing FDK does not guarantee that vomitoxin levels are also being lowered. Flaman said it’s critically important to know what you have in your bin and what you’re trying to remove from a sample.

“Early in the season, a lot of guys were getting away with selling their grain based on visual parameters only,” said Flaman, who sells a variety of grain cleaners, including colour sorters, gravity tables and highly specialized machines that sort grain using near infrared transmittance.“ In other words, if you could clean up your grain visually, there were some elevators that were buying based on visual grades only,” he said. “But what we started to find out later was that some stuff that looked very good visually still had very high levels of vomitoxin. So toward the end of the year, it seemed like almost every elevator started to price grain based on vomitoxin.”

The task of buying and selling grain can become a bit murky when FDK and vomitoxin are involved. In part, that’s because FDK is recognized in Canada as a visual grading determinant, while vomitoxin is not. However, vomitoxin is often mentioned in delivery contracts as a quality or contract spec, meaning high levels can significantly affect the value of grain being sold, regardless of how good the delivery looks. In some cases, farmers who cleaned up their samples to remove FDK were surprised to learn that they were facing substantial price discounts because vomitoxin levels were still above spec, Flaman said. “Understanding the difference between visual FDK and internal kernel toxicity (DON) has kept the industry busy with this year’s epidemic.”

“In the last few weeks, I’ve had more interest, more inquiries from people that are interested in (cleaning grain), than I could possibly handle in an entire year,” said Jason Basset, a grain farmer from Bruno, Sask., who also runs a grain cleaning company called Peterson Grain Processing. Basset is currently waiting to take delivery of a BoMill TriQ, a Swedish built grain cleaner that uses near infrared transmittance to remove vomitoxin. Unlike colour sorters that use near infrared reflectance to assess the external surface of a seed, the TriQ uses light to penetrate the seed coat. This allows the machine to assess a seed’s internal chemical composition. The TriQ has the ability to analyze each seed individually and sort seeds based on vomitoxin levels. Basset plans to use his machine to remove vomitoxin from malting barley. Vomitoxin specs for malting barley are typically.5 to one p.p.m. In one barley sample that Basset had analyzed, the TriQ removed 18 percent of the most heavily infected kernels and reduced total vomitoxin levels from two p.p.m. or higher to .5 p.p.m. or lower. In that scenario, a 10,000 bushel bin of barley that would otherwise be rejected by maltsters and sold as feed could potentially be cleaned and sold as 8,200 bu. of malt.

For the full article visit the Western Producer Online

Like what you read here?

Why not sign up for our newsletter to receive more?

Posted in Ag news | Tagged with grain cleaning Bomill Vomitoxin Fusarium | More articles by MIchelle Corry